首页> 外文OA文献 >Shift from intravenous or 16% subcutaneous replacement therapy to 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary antibody deficiencies
【2h】

Shift from intravenous or 16% subcutaneous replacement therapy to 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary antibody deficiencies

机译:原发性抗体缺乏症患者从静脉或16%皮下替代疗法转变为20%皮下免疫球蛋白

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In patients with primary antibody deficiencies, subcutaneous administration of IgG (SCIG) replacement is effective, safe, well-tolerated, and can be self-administered at home. A new SCIG replacement at 20% concentration (Hizentra(®)) has been developed and has replaced Vivaglobin(®) (SCIG 16%).An observational prospective multi-centric open-label study, with retrospective comparison was conducted in 15 Italian centers, in order to investigate whether and to what extent switching to Hizentra(®) would affect frequency of infusions, number of infusion sites, patients' satisfaction, and tolerability in patients previously treated with Vivaglobin(®) or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG).Any variations of dosage, frequency and duration of the infusions, and of number of infusion sites induced by Hizentra(®) with respect to the former treatment were recorded. Practical advantages and disadvantages of Hizentra(®), with respect to the medicinal product formerly used, and the variations in patients' therapy-related satisfaction were monitored by means of the TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication); number, frequency, and duration of infectious events and adverse effects were recorded.Eighty-two patients switched to Hizentra(®): 19 (23.2%) from IVIG and 63 (76.8%) from Vivaglobin(®) The mean interval between infusions was not affected by the shift (7.0 ± 2.0 days with previous treatment versus 7.1 ± 1.2 during Hizentra(®)). A decrease in the number of infusion sites with Hizentra(®) was recorded in 12 out of 56 patients for whom these data were available. At 6 months, 89.7% of patients were satisfied with Hizentra(®); no difference in terms of effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction was observed. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was reported.
机译:对于原发性抗体缺乏的患者,皮下注射IgG(SCIG)替代治疗是有效,安全,耐受性良好的,并且可以在家自行给药。已开发出浓度为20%的新型SCIG替代品(Hizentra(®)),并已替代Vivaglobin®®(SCIG 16%)。在意大利15个中心进行了一项观察性前瞻性多中心开放标签研究,并进行了回顾性比较,以调查切换到Hizentra(®)是否会影响输液频率,以及在多大程度上影响输注频率,输注部位数量,患者满意度以及先前接受过Vivaglobin(®)或静脉内免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗的患者的耐受性。记录了剂量,频率和持续时间的变化以及Hizentra®相对于前一种治疗方法诱导的输液部位数量的变化。通过TSQM(药物治疗满意度问卷)监测了Hizentra(®)在以前使用的药物方面的实际优缺点和与患者治疗相关的满意度的变化;记录感染事件的数量,频率和持续时间以及不良反应。八十二例患者转用Hizentra(®):IVIG中19例(23.2%),Vivaglobin®中63例(76.8%)。不受移位的影响(以前的治疗为7.0±2.0天,而Hizentra(®)则为7.1±1.2)。在可获得这些数据的56名患者中,有12名患者记录了使用Hizentra®的输液部位数量减少。在6个月时,有89.7%的患者对Hizentra®感到满意;在有效性,副作用,便利性和全球满意度方面均未观察到差异。不良事件的发生率没有差异的报道。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号